Synthesis and biocompatibility of an experimental glass ionomer cement prepared by a non-hydrolytic sol-gel method

The aims of this study were to demonstrate the synthesis of an experimental glass ionomer cement (GIC) by the non-hydrolytic sol-gel method and to evaluate its biocompatibility in comparison to a conventional glass ionomer cement (Vidrion R). Four polyethylene tubes containing the tested cements were implanted in the dorsal region of 15 rats, as follows: GI - experimental GIC and GII - conventional GIC. The external tube walls was considered the control group (CG). The rats were sacrificed 7, 21 and 42 days after implant placement for histopathological analysis. A four-point (I-IV) scoring system was used to graduate the inflammatory reaction. Regarding the experimental GIC sintherization, thermogravimetric and x-ray diffraction analysis demonstrated vitreous material formation at 110oC by the sol-gel method. For biocompatibility test, results showed a moderate chronic inflammatory reaction for GI (III), severe for GII (IV) and mild for CG (II) at 7 days. After 21 days, GI presented a mild reaction (II); GII, moderate (III) and CG, mild (II). At 42 days, GI showed a mild/absent inflammatory reaction (II to I), similar to GII (II to I). CG presented absence of chronic inflammatory reaction (I). It was concluded that the experimental GIC presented mild/absent tissue reaction after 42 days, being biocompatible when tested in the connective tissue of rats.

O objetivo deste estudo foi demonstrar a sinterização pelo método sol-gel não-hidrolítico de um cimento de ionômero de vidro experimental (CIV) e avaliar sua biocompatibilidade em relação a um cimento de ionômero de vidro convencional (Vidrion R). Quatro tubos de polietileno contendo os cimentos testados foram implantados no dorso de 15 ratos, da seguinte maneira: GI - CIV Experimental e GII - CIV Convencional. A lateral do tubo foi considerada Grupo Controle. Os ratos foram sacrificados em 7, 21 e 42 dias pós-implantação para análise histopatológica. Uma escala de I a IV foi utilizada como sistema de score para graduar a reação inflamatória. Em relação à sinterização do CIV experimental, as análises termogravométrica e por difração de raio-x demonstraram a formação de material vítreo aos 110oC pelo método sol-gel. Para o teste de biocompatibilidade, os resultados mostraram uma reação inflamatória moderada para o GI (III), severa para o GII (IV) e branda para o Grupo Controle (II) aos 7 dias. Após 21 dias, GI apresentou uma reação branda (II); GII, moderada (III) e Grupo Controle, branda (II). Aos 42 dias, GI apresentou uma reação inflamatória branda/ausente (II a I), similar ao GII (II a I). O Grupo Controle demonstrou ausência de reação inflamatória (I). Concluiu-se que o CIV Experimental apresentou reação tecidual branda/ausente após 42 dias, sendo biocompatível quando testado em tecido conjuntivo de ratos.

Quality control of beer hopped with reduced isomerised products

The traditional method for measuring bitterness in beer by UV absorbance (ASBC9.6) remains a viable quality control method for normally hopped beer. However, after reduction of isoalpha acids specific absorptivity of active components change and HPLC analysis showns to be a reliable method for quality control of these materials. This work is intended to adapt mathematically the ASBC(American Society of Brewing Chemist) spectrophotometrical method and to evaluate an HPLC method to control composition of different commercial reduced isomerised products added to unhopped wort and partially kettle hopped beer. The results we obtained showed that the HPLC method is reliable for quality control of reduced isomerised products and that the traditional spectrophotometrical method is viable for quality control of beer, also using reduced isomerised products as far as an adequate factor is used.